<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sola Scriptura</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3waystolive.com/2008/01/sola-scriptura.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3waystolive.com/2008/01/sola-scriptura.html</link>
	<description>Which is your way?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.3waystolive.com/2008/01/sola-scriptura.html#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3waystolive.com/3waystolive/?p=127#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I always thought the 5 solas should be pretty straigtforward concepts for a christian. &lt;br/&gt;To me, the basic idea of sola scriptura is that the bible is the final authority and no supplements of tradition and teachings of the church is necessary.  This is a fact.  But the bible may not be so 'self-interpreting' to most of us.  Thus when Man attempts to teach or interpret the bible, thats when 'danger' arises and thats when we need the Holy Spirit to guide us to discern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought the 5 solas should be pretty straigtforward concepts for a christian. <br />To me, the basic idea of sola scriptura is that the bible is the final authority and no supplements of tradition and teachings of the church is necessary.  This is a fact.  But the bible may not be so &#8217;self-interpreting&#8217; to most of us.  Thus when Man attempts to teach or interpret the bible, thats when &#8216;danger&#8217; arises and thats when we need the Holy Spirit to guide us to discern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitali</title>
		<link>http://www.3waystolive.com/2008/01/sola-scriptura.html#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3waystolive.com/3waystolive/?p=127#comment-97</guid>
		<description>No, these are different things. There is a connection though. Those who don't like authority of the Bible but still want to say it is the source of truth often tend to say that it is true but not literaly true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, these are different things. There is a connection though. Those who don&#8217;t like authority of the Bible but still want to say it is the source of truth often tend to say that it is true but not literaly true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awake In Rochester</title>
		<link>http://www.3waystolive.com/2008/01/sola-scriptura.html#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Awake In Rochester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3waystolive.com/3waystolive/?p=127#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Sola Scriptura is that the same as literal interpretation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sola Scriptura is that the same as literal interpretation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

